In Re Jarvis

351 B.R. 894, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2598, 2006 WL 2827367
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee
DecidedSeptember 29, 2006
Docket06-31459
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 351 B.R. 894 (In Re Jarvis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Jarvis, 351 B.R. 894, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2598, 2006 WL 2827367 (Tenn. 2006).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ON UNITED STATES TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR IMPOSITION OF FINES PURSUANT TO 11 U.S.C. § 110 (2005)

RICHARD STAIR, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.

This contested matter is before the court on the Motion for Imposition of Fines Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 110(i)(l), (2)(D) and for Forfeiture of Compensation Pursuant to § 110(h) and Notice of Hearing (Motion) filed by the United States Trustee, Richard F. Clippard, on August 22, 2006. By this Motion, the United States Trustee requests an order directing J.H. Mayton, a bankruptcy petition preparer, to forfeit all compensation received from the Debtor in this bankruptcy case and imposing fines against Mr. Mayton pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 110 (2005). A hearing on the Motion was held on September 21, 2006. Mr. Mayton did not appear, nor did he otherwise respond to the Motion.

This is a core proceeding. 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A).

I

From the record in this bankruptcy case, the court makes the following findings:

1. The Debtor filed the Voluntary Petition commencing her bankruptcy case under Chapter 7, pro se, on July 7, 2006. The petition was signed by the Debtor and does not disclose that it was prepared by a bankruptcy petition preparer. The petition was not accompanied by the compensation disclosure statement that is required to be filed by a bankruptcy petition preparer pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 110(h)(2).

2. The Debtor filed a number of documents on July 24, 2006, including her *896 Statement of Financial Affairs, Schedules A — J with the accompanying Declaration Concerning Debtor’s Schedules, and Chapter 7 Individual Debtor’s Statement of Intention. These three documents were signed by the Debtor and dated July 24, 2006. In the section on each document entitled “Declaration of Non-Attorney Bankruptcy Petition Preparer (see 11 U.S.C. § 110)” or “Certification and Signature of Non-Attorney Bankruptcy Petition Preparer (see 11 U.S.C. § 110),” the following typewritten language has been inserted below the lines requiring the name and address of the bankruptcy petition preparer who prepared the document for compensation:

Mayton, J.H., J.D.
(not licensed to practice law in this jurisdiction)
1814 John West Road # 215
Dallas, TX 75228 1

Mr. Mayton’s social security number also appears on each of these documents. Mr. Mayton did not, however, sign these documents.

3. The United States Trustee filed the present Motion on August 22, 2006. On the same date, the Debtor or J.H. Mayton filed the following documents: an Amended Voluntary Petition; an Amended Declaration Concerning Debtor’s Schedules; an Amended Chapter 7 Individual Debtor’s Statement of Intention; Disclosure of Compensation of Bankruptcy Petition Preparer, disclosing the Debtor’s payment to Mr. Mayton of $100.00 prior to the commencement of her bankruptcy case “for document preparation services”; 2 a Declaration and Signature of Non-Attorney Bankruptcy Petition Preparer (see 11 U.S.C. § 110); and a Notice to Debtor by Non-Attorney Bankruptcy Petition Preparer. All of these documents were signed by the Debtor on August 22, 2006, the date they were filed. They were also signed by Mr. Mayton, although the date of his signature, where required, is not inserted. The letters “J.D.” appear beside Mr. Mayton’s typed or printed name on each document.

4. The Debtor testified at a hearing held on August 24, 2006, in opposition to an automatic stay motion filed by Wells Fargo Bank, NA, requesting modification of the stay to allow it to foreclose on its lien encumbering the Debtor’s residence, that Mr. Mayton prepared, on her behalf, the Debtor’s Response in Objection to Creditor Wells Fargo Bank’s Motion for Relief From Automatic Stay filed by the Debtor, pro se, on August 8, 2006, and the Brief in Support of Debtor’s Response in Objection to Creditor Wells Fargo Bank’s Motion for Relief From Automatic Stay filed by the Debtor, pro se, on August 22, 2006. Mr. Mayton’s name does not appear on either of these documents, and he is, by his own admission, not licensed to practice law in the State of Tennessee, nor is he authorized to appear, pro' hac vice, before this court. 3

*897 II

The court finds that J.H. Mayton is a bankruptcy petition preparer as defined by 11 U.S.C. § 110(a), 4 subject to the provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 110, and that he has violated numerous obligations required of him by this statute.

Section 110(b)(2)

This section requires a bankruptcy petition preparer to provide certain notice to a debtor prior to preparing any document for filing or accepting any fee. Specifically, § 110(b)(2) provides:

(2)(A) Before preparing any document for filing or accepting any fees from a debtor, the bankruptcy petition preparer shall provide to the debtor a written notice which shall be on an official form prescribed by the Judicial Conference of the United States in accordance with rule 9009 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
(B) The notice under subparagraph (A)-
(i) shall inform the debtor in simple language that a bankruptcy petition preparer is not an attorney and may not practice law or give legal advice;
(ii) may contain a description of examples of legal advice that a bankruptcy petition preparer is not authorized to give, in addition to any advice that the preparer may not give by reason of subsection (e)(2); and
(iii) shall—
(I) be signed by the debtor and, under penalty of perjury, by the bankruptcy petition preparer; and
(II) be filed with any document for filing.

11 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Trustee v. McIntire (In Re Sanchez)
446 B.R. 531 (D. New Mexico, 2011)
McDow v. Skinner (In Re Jay)
446 B.R. 227 (E.D. Virginia, 2010)
In Re Rojero
399 B.R. 913 (D. New Mexico, 2008)
McDow v. Mayton (In Re McDow)
379 B.R. 601 (E.D. Virginia, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
351 B.R. 894, 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 2598, 2006 WL 2827367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jarvis-tneb-2006.