In re Janover

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Janover

179 A.D. 882, 165 N.Y.S. 645, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6517

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 A.D. 882 (In re Janover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Janover, 179 A.D. 882, 165 N.Y.S. 645, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Charges of professional misconduct have been filed against respondent and he has filed his answer with voluminous affidavits. Upon careful - consideration we think that upon the conceded facts respondent has not been guilty of such professional wrongdoing as to call for disciplinary proceedings and that no reference is required. By his own admissions respondent was negligent in caring for the interests of his client and such negligence was the cause of trouble and expense to said client and brought about the institution of this proceeding. But there was no element of deceit or fraud or such conduct as to affect respondent’s character. With this expression of our views the proceeding will be dismissed. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ. Proceeding dismissed. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Charges of professional misconduct have been filed against respondent and he has filed his answer with voluminous affidavits. Upon careful - consideration we think that upon the conceded facts respondent has not been guilty of such professional wrongdoing as to call for disciplinary proceedings and that no reference is required. By his own admissions respondent was negligent in caring for the interests of his client and such negligence was the cause of trouble and expense to said client and brought about the institution of this proceeding. But there was no element of deceit or fraud or such conduct as to affect respondent’s character. With this expression of our views the proceeding will be dismissed. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ. Proceeding dismissed. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 A.D. 882, 165 N.Y.S. 645, 1917 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6517, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-janover-nyappdiv-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack