In re Janine W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Janine W.

32 A.D.2d 611, 300 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4294

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1969

StatusPublished

This text of 32 A.D.2d 611 (In re Janine W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Janine W., 32 A.D.2d 611, 300 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4294 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: With commendable fairness the County Attorney has conceded that People v. Duke, People v. Acker, and People v. Vargas, reported together at 23 N Y 2d 780, are here controlling. In the light of these decisions, the record does not establish that the infant was a wayward minor. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Family Court, adjudicating respondent to be a wayward minor.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously reversed and petition dismissed. Memorandum: With commendable fairness the County Attorney has conceded that People v. Duke, People v. Acker, and People v. Vargas, reported together at 23 N Y 2d 780, are here controlling. In the light of these decisions, the record does not establish that the infant was a wayward minor. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Family Court, adjudicating respondent to be a wayward minor.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A.D.2d 611, 300 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-janine-w-nyappdiv-1969.