In Re Jane Layton v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00831-CV
IN RE Jane LAYTON
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 21, 2026
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF DENIED AS MOOT
Relator filed her petition for writ of mandamus on December 24, 2025 challenging the trial
court order granting the real party in interests motion to disqualify relator’s counsel. Relator filed
a motion for emergency relief on January 5, 2026. Having reviewed the petition, motion, and
accompanying record, this court has determined that relator has not established that she is entitled
to the relief sought. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
The emergency motion for temporary relief is DENIED AS MOOT.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025-CV-04668, styled Asia Layton v. Cameron Todd Layton, pending in the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David J. Rodriguez presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Jane Layton v. the State of Texas (In Re Jane Layton v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.