In Re Jane Layton v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Jane Layton v. the State of Texas (In Re Jane Layton v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00831-CV
IN RE Jane LAYTON
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Lori Massey Brissette, Justice Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 21, 2026
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF DENIED AS MOOT
Relator filed her petition for writ of mandamus on December 24, 2025 challenging the trial
court order granting the real party in interests motion to disqualify relator’s counsel. Relator filed
a motion for emergency relief on January 5, 2026. Having reviewed the petition, motion, and
accompanying record, this court has determined that relator has not established that she is entitled
to the relief sought. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
The emergency motion for temporary relief is DENIED AS MOOT.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025-CV-04668, styled Asia Layton v. Cameron Todd Layton, pending in the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David J. Rodriguez presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Jane Layton v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jane-layton-v-the-state-of-texas-txctapp4-2026.