In re Jane Doe 5

699 N.E.2d 521, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1425, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Jane Doe 5. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 Ohio St. 3d 1415
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 16, 1998·No. 98-1716·Published

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA98-08-168. This cause, here on appeal from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. On consideration thereof, the appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

It is further ordered that the parties are to bear their respective costs herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County to carry this judgment into execution; and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals for Butler County for entry.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Cook, J., concurs, as there is no ripe constitutional question. Douglas, J., dissents. Resnick, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Jane Doe 5, 699 N.E.2d 521, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1425, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2560 (Ohio 1998).

699 N.E.2d 521 (In re Jane Doe 5) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.