In re Jane Doe 4

683 N.E.2d 784, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2473
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 29, 1997
Docket97-1720
StatusPublished

This text of 683 N.E.2d 784 (In re Jane Doe 4) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jane Doe 4, 683 N.E.2d 784, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2473 (Ohio 1997).

Opinion

Butler App. No. CA97-08-0160. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to seal record/doeument and motion to expedite appeal and argument.

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to seal record/document and motion to expedite appeal be, and hereby are, granted.

F.E. Sweeney, J., would deny the motion to expedite.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the court declines jurisdiction to hear the ease and dismisses the appeal as not involving any substantial constitutional question.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
683 N.E.2d 784, 79 Ohio St. 3d 1478, 1997 Ohio LEXIS 2473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jane-doe-4-ohio-1997.