in Re James Westly Groves
This text of in Re James Westly Groves (in Re James Westly Groves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued September 23, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-14-00663-CV ——————————— IN RE JAMES WESTLY GROVES, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, James Westly Groves, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus
contending that respondent, the Honorable James Lombardino, abused his discretion in excluding the testimony of a psychologist as an expert witness at trial
in the underlying proceeding.1
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp.
1 The underlying case is In the Interest of A.F.G. and B.D.G, Cause No. 2008-14866, in the 308th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable James Lombardino presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Westly Groves, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-westly-groves-texapp-2014.