In re James V. G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re James V. G.

256 A.D.2d 1191, 683 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14341

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1998

DocketAppeal No. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 1191 (In re James V. G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re James V. G., 256 A.D.2d 1191, 683 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed to communicate with either his son or petitioner for the six-month period before the filing of the abandonment petition (see, Matter of Ariel C., 248 AD2d 976, lv denied 92 NY2d 801). Thus, Family Court properly determined that respondent’s son was abandoned, transferred guardianship and custody of the child to petitioner and dismissed respondent’s custody petition. We have examined respondent’s remaining contention and conclude that it lacks merit. (Appeal from Order of Genesee County Family Court, Graney, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that respondent failed to communicate with either his son or petitioner for the six-month period before the filing of the abandonment petition (see, Matter of Ariel C., 248 AD2d 976, lv denied 92 NY2d 801). Thus, Family Court properly determined that respondent’s son was abandoned, transferred guardianship and custody of the child to petitioner and dismissed respondent’s custody petition. We have examined respondent’s remaining contention and conclude that it lacks merit. (Appeal from Order of Genesee County Family Court, Graney, J. — Terminate Parental Rights.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Boehm, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 1191, 683 N.Y.S.2d 448, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-v-g-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack