in Re James Thomas Green

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 2, 2010
Docket14-10-00048-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re James Thomas Green (in Re James Thomas Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re James Thomas Green, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed February 2, 2010

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-10-00048-CR

In Re James Thomas Green, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM  OPINION

            On January 15, 2010, relator, James Thomas Green, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the Honorable Joan Campbell, presiding judge of the 248th District Court of Harris County, to “enter Judgment of Acquittal in cause number 715266 with respect to the untimely abandoned, i.e., acquitted murder count, or to answer why relator does not have a liberty interest and entitlement to such judgment via the Fifth Amendment Double Jeopardy Clause.”  This court previously affirmed relator’s conviction for murder.  See Green v. State, No. 14-96-01536-CR, 1999 WL 33620 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 28, 1999, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication).

            Relator is seeking post-conviction habeas relief.  Although courts of appeals have jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to final post-conviction felony proceedings.  Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App.1991) (orig. proceeding).  Therefore, we do not have jurisdiction in this original proceeding.

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

                                                                                    PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Boyce, and Sullivan.

Do Not Publish—Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re James Thomas Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-thomas-green-texapp-2010.