In re James

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re James

354 S.E.2d 36, 291 S.C. 420, 1987 S.C. LEXIS 305

DecidedMarch 10, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 354 S.E.2d 36 (In re James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re James, 354 S.E.2d 36, 291 S.C. 420, 1987 S.C. LEXIS 305 (S.C. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The above named filed a petition on March 31,1986, seeking reinstatement to the practice of law in the State of South Carolina with no limitations. Pursuant to the Rules on Disciplinary Procedure, this petition was submitted to the Committee on Character and Fitness on January 30, 1987, for its investigation and recommendation.

It is the unanimous recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness that petitioner, William Richard James, be reinstated without limitations as a member of the South Carolina Bar, and

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The above named filed a petition on March 31,1986, seeking reinstatement to the practice of law in the State of South Carolina with no limitations. Pursuant to the Rules on Disciplinary Procedure, this petition was submitted to the Committee on Character and Fitness on January 30, 1987, for its investigation and recommendation.

It is the unanimous recommendation of the Committee on Character and Fitness that petitioner, William Richard James, be reinstated without limitations as a member of the South Carolina Bar, and

It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

354 S.E.2d 36, 291 S.C. 420, 1987 S.C. LEXIS 305, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-sc-1987.