In Re: James Randal Downs v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: James Randal Downs v. the State of Texas (In Re: James Randal Downs v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
§ IN RE No. 08-24-00110-CR § JAMES RANDALL DOWNS, AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING § Relator. IN MANDAMUS §
JUDGMENT
The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and
concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied for want of jurisdiction.
We therefore deny the petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with
the opinion of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2024.
GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: James Randal Downs v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-randal-downs-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.