in Re James Ramey, Sean Ramey, and All Occupants
This text of in Re James Ramey, Sean Ramey, and All Occupants (in Re James Ramey, Sean Ramey, and All Occupants) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 5, 2012.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________
NO. 14-11-01076-CV ____________
IN RE JAMES RAMEY, SEAN RAMEY, AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS County Civil Court at Law No. 1 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 860916
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On, December 14, 2011, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Relators complain that respondent, the Honorable Debra Ibarra Mayfield, presiding judge of County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County, Texas, abused her discretion by denying relators' motion to set a supersedeas bond pending appeal of an order denying a stay.
Relators have not established they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators' petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Brown, Boyce, and McCally.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Ramey, Sean Ramey, and All Occupants, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-ramey-sean-ramey-and-all-occupants-texapp-2012.