In re James

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re James

635 A.2d 506, 134 N.J. 526, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1314

DecidedDecember 22, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 635 A.2d 506 (In re James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re James, 635 A.2d 506, 134 N.J. 526, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1314 (N.J. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court recommending that V. JOSEPH JAMES of ST. MARY’S, PENNSYLVANIA, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that V. JOSEPH JAMES is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics take such protective action, pursuant to Rule l:20-ll(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of V. JOSEPH JAMES, wherever situate, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by V. JOSEPH JAMES, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that V. JOSEPH JAMES show cause before this Court on January 19, 1993, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court Courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey, why his temporary suspension and the restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any ethics proceedings pending against him and further why the funds restrained from disbursement should not be transmitted by the financial institutions who are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

[527]*527ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that V. JOSEPH JAMES be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Supreme Court recommending that V. JOSEPH JAMES of ST. MARY’S, PENNSYLVANIA, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that V. JOSEPH JAMES is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that the Office of Attorney Ethics take such protective action, pursuant to Rule l:20-ll(c), as may be appropriate to gain possession and control of the legal files, records, practice and trust assets of V. JOSEPH JAMES, wherever situate, pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by V. JOSEPH JAMES, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, shall be restrained from disbursement except upon application to this Court, for good cause shown, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that V. JOSEPH JAMES show cause before this Court on January 19, 1993, at 2:00 p.m., Supreme Court Courtroom, Hughes Justice Complex, Trenton, New Jersey, why his temporary suspension and the restraints herein should not continue pending final disposition of any ethics proceedings pending against him and further why the funds restrained from disbursement should not be transmitted by the financial institutions who are the present custodians to the Clerk of the Superior Court for deposit in the Superior Court Trust Fund, pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further

[527]*527ORDERED that David E. Johnson, Jr., Esquire, or his designee, present this matter to the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that V. JOSEPH JAMES be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Administrative Guideline No. 23 of the Office of Attorney Ethics dealing with suspended attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

635 A.2d 506, 134 N.J. 526, 1993 N.J. LEXIS 1314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-nj-1993.