In re James

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re James

36 N.J. Eq. 547

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1883·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered- by

Beasley, C. J.

In my opinion, the testimony taken under the inquisition in this case did not satisfactorily show that the subject of it was of unsound mind, and I therefore think the decree should be reversed and the case remitted, with instructions that the appellant be permitted to traverse the inquisition, or that an issue be directed.

Decree unanimously reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered- by

Beasley, C. J.

In my opinion, the testimony taken under the inquisition in this case did not satisfactorily show that the subject of it was of unsound mind, and I therefore think the decree should be reversed and the case remitted, with instructions that the appellant be permitted to traverse the inquisition, or that an issue be directed.

Decree unanimously reversed.

In re James, 36 N.J. Eq. 547 (N.J. 1883).

Pincite

36 N.J. Eq. 547 (In re James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.