In re James

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re James

36 N.J. Eq. 547

DecidedMarch 15, 1883

StatusPublished

This text of 36 N.J. Eq. 547 (In re James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re James, 36 N.J. Eq. 547 (N.J. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered- by

Beasley, C. J.

In my opinion, the testimony taken under the inquisition in this case did not satisfactorily show that the subject of it was of unsound mind, and I therefore think the decree should be reversed and the case remitted, with instructions that the appellant be permitted to traverse the inquisition, or that an issue be directed.

Decree unanimously reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the court was delivered- by

Beasley, C. J.

In my opinion, the testimony taken under the inquisition in this case did not satisfactorily show that the subject of it was of unsound mind, and I therefore think the decree should be reversed and the case remitted, with instructions that the appellant be permitted to traverse the inquisition, or that an issue be directed.

Decree unanimously reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 N.J. Eq. 547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-nj-1883.