in Re James Myart
This text of in Re James Myart (in Re James Myart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 23, 2020
No. 04-20-00593-CR
IN RE James MYART
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
ORDER
On December 11, 2020, relator filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. After considering the petition and because relator is represented by counsel in the trial court, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
It is so ORDERED on December 23, 2020.
_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of December, 2020.
_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CR0945, styled The State of Texas v. James Willie Myart, Jr., pending in the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Myart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-myart-texapp-2020.