In re James

558 A.2d 709, 1989 Me. LEXIS 127
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJune 1, 1989
StatusPublished

This text of 558 A.2d 709 (In re James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re James, 558 A.2d 709, 1989 Me. LEXIS 127 (Me. 1989).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Debra W. appeals a District Court (Bangor, Kravchuk, J.) order terminating her parental rights to her nine-year-old son, James J. Contrary to Debra’s contention, the record presents clear and convincing evidence to support the court’s findings

that Debra is unable or unwilling to take responsibility for James or to protect him from jeopardy within a time reasonably calculated to meet his needs, and that conditions are unlikely to change within a time reasonably calculated to meet James’ needs. 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055(l)(B)(2)(b)(i), (ii) (Supp.1988); In re Misty Lee H., 529 A.2d 331, 332-33 (Me.1987). In addition, the record supports the court’s conclusion that it is highly probable that termination of Debra’s parental rights is in James’ best interests. 22 M.R.S.A. § 4055(l)(B)(2)(a); In re Amanda, 549 A.2d 1133 (Me.1988).

The entry is:

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Misty Lee H.
529 A.2d 331 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1987)
In Re Amanda D.
549 A.2d 1133 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 A.2d 709, 1989 Me. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-me-1989.