in Re James Marcus Miles

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2019
Docket01-18-01133-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re James Marcus Miles (in Re James Marcus Miles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re James Marcus Miles, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Opinion issued January 29, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-01133-CR ——————————— IN RE JAMES MARCUS MILES, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator James Marcus Miles seeks habeas corpus relief “for free copy of the

statement of facts in the above-styled cause, on appeal.”1 Relator has also filed a

motion to appeal as indigent and a motion for bail or bond. We dismiss for want of

jurisdiction.

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. James Marcus Miles, cause number1578944, pending in the 179th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Randy Roll presiding. An appellate court may issue a writ of habeas corpus when a person’s liberty

is restrained by an order issued by a court based on violation of a previous order

entered by a court in a civil case. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(d). Appellant is

not complaining that his liberty is restrained by an order signed by a trial court in a

civil case. Therefore, this Court is without jurisdiction to issue the relief requested

in this petition. See, e.g., In re Thomas, No. 01–15–00786–CR, 2015 WL 6081429,

at * 1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 13, 2015, orig. proceeding) (dismissing

for want of jurisdiction petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking relief in criminal

case).

If an appeal had been filed in this Court, we could construe this petition as a

motion to obtain a free record. But no appeal of a conviction with this trial court

cause number has been filed in this court.

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Any pending

motions are denied.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Lloyd, Kelly, and Hightower. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re James Marcus Miles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-marcus-miles-texapp-2019.