in Re: James Levi Smith
This text of in Re: James Levi Smith (in Re: James Levi Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 9, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00793-CV
IN RE JAMES LEVI SMITH, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On July 16, 2003, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court seeking to vacate the trial court=s September 13, 2002 dismissal of his divorce lawsuit for want of prosecution. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2003); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. The petition is not in compliance with Tex. R. App. P. 52.3. Furthermore, mandamus relief is available only in limited circumstances to correct a clear abuse of discretion when the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-44 (Tex. 1992). Relator had an adequate remedy by appeal following dismissal of his case.
We deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 9, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Anderson, Seymore, and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: James Levi Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-levi-smith-texapp-2003.