In Re: James Jones v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re: James Jones v. the State of Texas (In Re: James Jones v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed April 10, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-23-00330-CV
IN RE JAMES JONES, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-21-18199
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Carlyle, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia Before the Court are relator’s April 10, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus
and emergency motion for temporary relief. In his petition, relator seeks mandamus
relief from the trial court’s March 27, 2023 Order Denying his “Motion for
Reconsideration of Denial of Agreed Motion for Continuance.”
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relator to demonstrate that the trial
court clearly abused its discretion and that relator lacks an adequate remedy by
appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding). After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that
relator has failed to show the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a). Having denied the petition, we also deny the emergency motion as moot.
/Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
230330F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: James Jones v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-jones-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.