in Re James John Palermo
This text of in Re James John Palermo (in Re James John Palermo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-08-00550-CV
In re James John Palermo
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator James John Palermo has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking
relief from an order signed by the trial court ten months ago, on October 23, 2007, modifying a prior
custody order. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. That order was a final, appealable order, subject to
the procedural rules applied to other appeals. See Bilyeu v. Bilyeu, 86 S.W.3d 278, 280
(Tex. App.—Austin 2002, no pet.) (“In a suit to modify a SAPCR, . . . the original decree remains
final and a new final order results from the modification proceeding.”); In re N.J.G., 980 S.W.2d
764, 766-67 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (“The Texas Family Code permits a party to
appeal ‘a final order’ in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.”). Thus, to attack the order,
Palermo had to file a notice of appeal within the usual appellate deadlines. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1.
We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.
__________________________________________
David Puryear, Justice
Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Waldrop
Filed: September 5, 2008
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James John Palermo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-john-palermo-texapp-2008.