In re: James Holloway
This text of In re: James Holloway (In re: James Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case No. 25-cv-13548
In re: James Holloway, Judith E. Levy United States District Judge
Mag. Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford
________________________________/
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE
James Holloway, a prisoner in the custody of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, filed a civil action challenging the conditions of his confinement. (ECF No. 1.) He also filed an application to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. (ECF No. 2.) Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), a prisoner seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis must submit a certified copy of the trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Because Holloway did not submit a certified trust fund account statement, the Court ordered him to do so within thirty days and cautioned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the case without prejudice. (ECF No. 3.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) gives the district court power to dismiss a complaint where “the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with [the Federal Rules] or a court order.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This rule
provides the Court a tool to effectively manage its docket. Knoll v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 176 F.3d 359, 362–63 (6th Cir. 1999). Holloway did not
comply with the deficiency order despite ample time and notice that noncompliance would result in dismissal. Therefore, the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. See May v. Pike Lake State Park, 8 F.
App’x 507, 508 (6th Cir. 2001) (affirming dismissal of case for lack of prosecution where pro se litigant failed to comply with “readily comprehended” order).
Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file a new complaint under a new case number provided he pays the applicable fees or files the necessary
documentation to proceed without prepayment of fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 9, 2026 s/Judith E. Levy Ann Arbor, Michigan JUDITH E. LEVY United States District Judge CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their respective email or first-class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on February 9, 2026. s/William Barkholz WILLIAM BARKHOLZ Case Manager
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: James Holloway, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-holloway-mied-2026.