in Re James Holland
This text of in Re James Holland (in Re James Holland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-16-00487-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE JAMES HOLLAND
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Per Curiam Order
Relator, James Holland, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion to stay
execution in the above cause on September 12, 2016 and September 13, 2016. Through
this original proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court to vacate an order
transferring venue of the underlying suit affecting the parent-child relationship from DeWitt
County, Texas to Hidalgo County, Texas. See generally TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. §153.001
(West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). Through his motion to stay execution, relator seeks
to transfer venue of this case back to DeWitt County pending resolution of this original
proceeding. The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to stay execution, is
of the opinion that the motion should be denied at this time. The Court requests that the
real party in interest, Elizabeth Castillo, or any others whose interest would be directly
affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or
before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed this 13th day of September, 2016.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Holland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-holland-texapp-2016.