in Re James Henry Aduddle
This text of in Re James Henry Aduddle (in Re James Henry Aduddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00183-CV
IN RE JAMES HENRY ADUDDLE, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On March 6, 2006, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Olen Underwood, presiding judge of the Second Administrative Region and the Honorable Thomas Culver, presiding judge of the 240th District Court of Fort Bend County, to rule on his second motion for recusal.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Yates and Guzman.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Henry Aduddle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-henry-aduddle-texapp-2006.