in Re James Henry Aduddle

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 30, 2006
Docket14-06-00183-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re James Henry Aduddle (in Re James Henry Aduddle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re James Henry Aduddle, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 29, 2006

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00183-CV

IN RE JAMES HENRY ADUDDLE, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

On March 6, 2006, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In the petition, relator asked this court to compel the Honorable Olen Underwood, presiding judge of the   Second Administrative Region and the Honorable Thomas Culver, presiding judge of the 240th District Court of Fort Bend County, to rule on his second motion for recusal.

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief.  Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 30, 2006.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Yates and Guzman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re James Henry Aduddle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-henry-aduddle-texapp-2006.