In re James H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re James H.

292 A.D.2d 869, 739 N.Y.S.2d 326

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 292 A.D.2d 869 (In re James H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re James H., 292 A.D.2d 869, 739 N.Y.S.2d 326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Niagara County (Batt, J.), entered June 5, 2001, which adjudged that reasonable efforts are not required to be made to reunify the parents with the children and directed petitioner to file a petition for a permanency hearing.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Family Court, Niagara County, Batt, J. Present — Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Bums and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of Family Court, Niagara County (Batt, J.), entered June 5, 2001, which adjudged that reasonable efforts are not required to be made to reunify the parents with the children and directed petitioner to file a petition for a permanency hearing.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Family Court, Niagara County, Batt, J. Present — Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Bums and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 A.D.2d 869, 739 N.Y.S.2d 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-h-nyappdiv-2002.