in Re: James H. Maples and Kathy Maples
This text of in Re: James H. Maples and Kathy Maples (in Re: James H. Maples and Kathy Maples) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-00517-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE SAN JUANITA SANDOVAL MORENO
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Emergency Motion.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relator, San Juanita Sandoval Moreno, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and an
“Emergency Motion to Stay Court-Ordered Mediation and Real Party’s Motion to Quash
Notices of Deposition by Written Questions Pending Outcome of Mandamus Petition” in
the above cause on August 29, 2008. On September 2, 2008, the real party in interest,
Ismael Moran, misnamed herein as “respondent,” filed a reply. The Court, having
examined and fully considered the emergency motion, the petition for writ of mandamus,
1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). and the reply thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown herself entitled to the
relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion are
DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 3rd day of September, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: James H. Maples and Kathy Maples, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-h-maples-and-kathy-maples-texapp-2008.