in Re James Green
This text of in Re James Green (in Re James Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice
Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2003
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
Relator seeks mandamus relief based on the trial court's failure to rule on his motion requesting an examining trial. Relator has not provided this court with a sufficient record to show that the trial court had a ministerial duty to rule on relator's motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7; see also Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding) (granting mandamus relief where record showed trial court had ministerial duty to rule). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
1. This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. NM771142, NM771143, NM771144, NM771145 & NM771146, styled The State of Texas v. James Green, pending in the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Green, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-green-texapp-2003.