in Re James Flowers

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 8, 2018
Docket01-17-00895-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re James Flowers (in Re James Flowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re James Flowers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Opinion issued March 8, 2018

In The

C ourt of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00894-CR NO. 01-17-00895-CR ——————————— IN RE JAMES FLOWERS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, James Flowers, has filed a “Defendant’s Writ of Exigi Facias and

Writ of Mandamus for Failure to Comply with T.C.C.P. Article 11.15,” which we

consider as a petition for a writ of mandamus. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.

§ 22.221(a) (West Supp. 2017) (providing court of appeals may issue writ of

mandamus and “other writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court”).

Relator seeks issuance of the writ to compel the trial court, in the underlying proceedings, to issue a writ of habeas corpus for relator’s release on his own

recognizance.1

We deny the petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bland, Lloyd, and Caughey. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP . P. 47.2(b).

1 The underlying causes are The State of Texas v. James Flowers, cause numbers 1488658 and 1466926, in the 339th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Maria T. Jackson presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re James Flowers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-flowers-texapp-2018.