in Re James Flowers
This text of in Re James Flowers (in Re James Flowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued March 8, 2018
In The
C ourt of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00894-CR NO. 01-17-00895-CR ——————————— IN RE JAMES FLOWERS, Relator
Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, James Flowers, has filed a “Defendant’s Writ of Exigi Facias and
Writ of Mandamus for Failure to Comply with T.C.C.P. Article 11.15,” which we
consider as a petition for a writ of mandamus. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN.
§ 22.221(a) (West Supp. 2017) (providing court of appeals may issue writ of
mandamus and “other writs necessary to enforce the jurisdiction of the court”).
Relator seeks issuance of the writ to compel the trial court, in the underlying proceedings, to issue a writ of habeas corpus for relator’s release on his own
recognizance.1
We deny the petition.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Bland, Lloyd, and Caughey. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP . P. 47.2(b).
1 The underlying causes are The State of Texas v. James Flowers, cause numbers 1488658 and 1466926, in the 339th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Maria T. Jackson presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Flowers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-flowers-texapp-2018.