in Re: James Flanagan

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 14, 2012·No. 05-12-01423-CV·Published

Opinion

Writ of Mandamus 1)enied, Opinion issued November 13, 2012

In The QIurt uf \pprabi Fifti! Oiitrtct uf ixas at Ia11a No. 05-12-01423-CV

IN RE JAMES FLANAGAN, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-12879

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley. FitzGerald, and Myers Opinion by Justice FitzGerald

Relator contends the trial judge erred in refusing to disqualify Terry Grewing as counsel for

real parties in interest. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount

them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the

relief requested. See TEx. R. App. p. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer. 827 S.W.2d 833. 839-40 (Tex.

1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relatofs petition for writ of mandamus.

TRYP FITZGERALD JUSTICE

1 21423F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: James Flanagan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

in Re: James Flanagan (in Re: James Flanagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walker v. Packer
827 S.W.2d 833 (Texas Supreme Court, 1992)