in Re: James Flanagan
Opinion
Writ of Mandamus 1)enied, Opinion issued November 13, 2012
In The QIurt uf \pprabi Fifti! Oiitrtct uf ixas at Ia11a No. 05-12-01423-CV
IN RE JAMES FLANAGAN, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-12879
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley. FitzGerald, and Myers Opinion by Justice FitzGerald
Relator contends the trial judge erred in refusing to disqualify Terry Grewing as counsel for
real parties in interest. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount
them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the
relief requested. See TEx. R. App. p. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer. 827 S.W.2d 833. 839-40 (Tex.
1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relatofs petition for writ of mandamus.
—
TRYP FITZGERALD JUSTICE
1 21423F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: James Flanagan (in Re: James Flanagan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.