in Re James F. Cotter, James Val Cotter, and Cotter & Sons, Inc.
This text of in Re James F. Cotter, James Val Cotter, and Cotter & Sons, Inc. (in Re James F. Cotter, James Val Cotter, and Cotter & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Karen Angelini, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 22, 2003
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
The court has considered relators' petition for writ of mandamus. The court is of the opinion that relief should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Relators shall pay all costs incurred in this proceeding.
1. This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2002-CI-00102, styled Daniel W. Parker and Anne K. Parker v. James F. Cotter, James Val Cotter, Cotter & Sons, Inc., River City Roofing & Remodeling, Inc., and Kenyon Construction, Inc. v. Fortuna Associates, Inc. and Betty Kirkpatrick v. State Farm Lloyds, Intervenor, pending in the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Andy Mireles presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James F. Cotter, James Val Cotter, and Cotter & Sons, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-f-cotter-james-val-cotter-and-cotter-s-texapp-2003.