in Re James Earl Johnson
This text of in Re James Earl Johnson (in Re James Earl Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-18-00690-CV
In re James Earl Johnson
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY
ORDER
PER CURIAM
Relator James Earl Johnson has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a
motion for stay pending mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1, 52.10(a). We grant the motion in
part and temporarily stay, pending further order of this Court, the trial court’s October 11, 2018
order that (1) Johnson produce unredacted bank records by noon on October 25, 2018; (2) real
party in interest Sofia Pargo does not need to produce her bank records or financial information;
and (3) Johnson shall pay attorney’s fees in the amount of $400, plus interest. See id.
R. 52.10(b). We do not stay any other trial-court deadlines or proceedings. The Court orders the
real party in interest Pargo to file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before
November 5, 2018.
It is ordered on October 25, 2018.
Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Field and Toth
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Earl Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-earl-johnson-texapp-2018.