in Re: James Earl Butler

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 14, 2010
Docket12-10-00160-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: James Earl Butler (in Re: James Earl Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: James Earl Butler, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

NO. 12-10-00160-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS ' IN RE: JAMES EARL BUTLER, RELATOR ' ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

' MEMORANDUM OPINION In this original proceeding, Relator James Earl Butler seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate his conviction for aggravated assault. As grounds for issuance of the writ, he alleges the conviction is void. Only the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. 1991); see also TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Because the relief sought in the relator’s petition relates to postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction, we are without jurisdiction to consider his petition for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, the relator’s petition is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. BRIAN HOYLE__ Justice

Opinion delivered July 14, 2010. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: James Earl Butler, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-earl-butler-texapp-2010.