In Re: James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust And Clinton Wesley White, Indvidually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust, by and Through His Next-Friend, James E. White, IV v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 9, 2023
Docket08-23-00247-CV
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust And Clinton Wesley White, Indvidually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust, by and Through His Next-Friend, James E. White, IV v. the State of Texas (In Re: James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust And Clinton Wesley White, Indvidually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust, by and Through His Next-Friend, James E. White, IV v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust And Clinton Wesley White, Indvidually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust, by and Through His Next-Friend, James E. White, IV v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: JAMES E. WHITE, IV, Individually § No. 08-23-00247-CV and as a named Beneficiary of the JANE WHITE TRUST; MARTI WHITE WRIGHT, § AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING Individually and as a named Beneficiary of the JANE WHITE TRUST; AND CLINTON § IN MANDAMUS WESLEY WHITE, Individually and as a named Beneficiary of the JANE WHITE § TRUST, by and Through his Next-Friend, JAMES E. WHITE, IV, §

Relators.

JUDGMENT

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Rex Emerson of 39th District Court of Presidio County, Texas and concludes that

Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the petition for writ

of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Soto, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.) Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust And Clinton Wesley White, Indvidually and as a Named Beneficiary of the Jane White Trust, by and Through His Next-Friend, James E. White, IV v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-e-white-iv-individually-and-as-a-named-beneficiary-of-the-texapp-2023.