in Re: James D. Yoo, Keith Ward, Hans Yoo, Young K. Yoo, and Danny Yoo

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re: James D. Yoo, Keith Ward, Hans Yoo, Young K. Yoo, and Danny Yoo

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 7, 2014·No. 05-14-01154-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered October 20, 2014

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01154-CV

IN RE JAMES D. YOO, KEITH WARD, HANS YOO, YOUNG K. YOO, AND DANNY YOO, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-14351

ORDER Before the Court is the motion of real parties in interest for a second extension of time to

file their response to the petition for writ of mandamus. We GRANT the motion. Real parties in

interest shall file their response on or before November 21, 2014.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered October 20, 2014

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01154-CV

IN RE JAMES D. YOO, KEITH WARD, HANS YOO, YOUNG K. YOO, AND DANNY YOO, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-14351

ORDER Before the Court is the motion of real parties in interest for a second extension of time to

file their response to the petition for writ of mandamus. We GRANT the motion. Real parties in

interest shall file their response on or before November 21, 2014.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG JUSTICE

in Re: James D. Yoo, Keith Ward, Hans Yoo, Young K. Yoo, and Danny Yoo, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

in Re: James D. Yoo, Keith Ward, Hans Yoo, Young K. Yoo, and Danny Yoo (in Re: James D. Yoo, Keith Ward, Hans Yoo, Young K. Yoo, and Danny Yoo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.