in Re: James D. Ryan, Solely as Trustee for the Maximilen Enoch Barton Trust and the Victoria Lynn Barton Trust
Opinion
Deny Writ and Opinion Filed July 1, 2013
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-00846-CV
IN RE JAMES D. RYAN, SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE MAXIMILEN ENOCH BARTON TRUST AND THE VICTORIA LYNN BARTON TRUST, Relator
On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12-01813
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Bridges Relator contends the trial judge erred in striking a petition in intervention. The facts and
issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record
before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, we DENY relator=s petition for writ of mandamus and LIFT the stay imposed by
this Court’s June 21, 2013 order.
/David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 130846F.P05 JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: James D. Ryan, Solely as Trustee for the Maximilen Enoch Barton Trust and the Victoria Lynn Barton Trust (in Re: James D. Ryan, Solely as Trustee for the Maximilen Enoch Barton Trust and the Victoria Lynn Barton Trust) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.