in Re James Carrillo Garcia

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 16, 2022
Docket03-22-00045-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re James Carrillo Garcia (in Re James Carrillo Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re James Carrillo Garcia, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00045-CV

In re James Carrillo Garcia

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM GAINES COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator James Carrillo Garcia, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice, filed a pro se original petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221;

see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. Relator complains that he has been unlawfully confined prior to trial.

As an intermediate appellate court, we may issue writs of habeas corpus against

a district judge or county judge only sitting in our district, or to enforce our jurisdiction. See

Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221. We lack jurisdiction to issue the requested writ against the

respondent, listed as the 106th District Court of Gaines County, because this Court neither has

jurisdiction over the district courts of Gaines County nor is such a writ necessary to enforce this

Court's appellate jurisdiction. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(a), (b)(1); see also id. § 22.201(d)

(listing the counties composing the Third Court of Appeal District). The Eleventh Court of

Appeals in Eastland has jurisdiction over Gaines County district courts. See Tex. Gov't Code

§§ 22.201(l), 22.212(a).

Furthermore, this Court does not have original habeas-corpus jurisdiction in

criminal cases. See Tex. Const. art. V, § 6 (providing that courts of appeals “shall have original or appellate jurisdiction, under such restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law”);

Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(d) (limiting original habeas-corpus jurisdiction of courts of appeals to

situations where relator's liberty is restrained by virtue of order, process, or commitment issued

by court or judge in civil case); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05 (vesting “power to

issue the writ of habeas corpus” in “[t]he Court of Criminal Appeals, the District Courts, the

County Courts, or any Judge of said Courts”). As an intermediate appellate court, our habeas-

corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(d); see

also In re Wilkins, No. 03-20-00381-CV, 2020 WL 5608486, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Sept. 17,

2020, orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we dismiss relator's application for writ of habeas corpus for want of

jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Filed: February 16, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 22.201
Texas GV § 22.201(l)
§ 22.221
Texas GV § 22.221

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re James Carrillo Garcia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-carrillo-garcia-texapp-2022.