In re James-Bey

Supreme Court

In re James-Bey

136 S. Ct. 494, 193 L. Ed. 2d 361, 84 U.S.L.W. 3258, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7134

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 9, 2015·No. No. 15–6559.·Published

Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from the petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *495Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of habeas corpus dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from the petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *495Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).

In re James-Bey, 136 S. Ct. 494, 193 L. Ed. 2d 361, 84 U.S.L.W. 3258, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 7134 (U.S. 2015).

Pincite

136 S. Ct. 494 (In re James-Bey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related