in Re: James Bell McCoy, Sr.
This text of in Re: James Bell McCoy, Sr. (in Re: James Bell McCoy, Sr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-08-597-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE JAMES BELL McCOY, SR.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1
Relator, James Bell McCoy, Sr., filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a “ Motion
for Leave of Court to File Fewer Copies” in the above cause on October 23, 2008. The
Court GRANTS relator’s motion for leave of Court and allows relator to proceed based on
the number of copies of the documents that have already filed herein.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus,
is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought.
1 See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W he n denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinio n but is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this 29th day of October, 2008.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: James Bell McCoy, Sr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-bell-mccoy-sr-texapp-2008.