in Re James Baxter, D.C.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 5, 2010·No. 14-10-00388-CV·Published

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 5, 2010.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-10-00388-CV

____________

IN RE JAMES BAXTER, D.C., Relator


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS


M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

            On May 4, 2010, relator, James Baxter, D.C., pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.[1]  In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Alexandra Smoots-Hogan, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, to grant a mistrial and set aside the directed verdict on the plaintiffs’ claims. 

            Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus.  Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

                                                                        PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Boyce.



[1] In the petition, relator states he is filing this petition on behalf of Protech Evaluation Services, Inc., Baxter Injury Centers, Sterling Imaging, and other plaintiff chiropractic offices. 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re James Baxter, D.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

in Re James Baxter, D.C. (in Re James Baxter, D.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.