in Re James Baxter, D.C.
This text of in Re James Baxter, D.C. (in Re James Baxter, D.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 3, 2010.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-10-00386-CV
IN RE JAMES BAXTER, D.C., Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On May 3, 2010, relator, James Baxter, D.C., pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.[1] In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Alexandra Smoots-Hogan, presiding judge of the 164th District Court of Harris County, to set aside her order denying his request for a jury trial.
Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and request for emergency relief.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Boyce.
[1] In the petition, relator states he is filing this petition on behalf of Protech Evaluation Services, Inc., Baxter Injury Centers, Sterling Imaging, and other plaintiff chiropractic offices.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James Baxter, D.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-baxter-dc-texapp-2010.