In re James B. Rudolph of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Registration No. 384848

183 A.3d 1282
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 3, 2018
DocketNo. 18–BG–286
StatusPublished

This text of 183 A.3d 1282 (In re James B. Rudolph of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Registration No. 384848) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re James B. Rudolph of Columbia Court of Appeals Bar Registration No. 384848, 183 A.3d 1282 (D.C. 2018).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Supreme Court of California suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of six months, stayed in favor of a one-year probationary period; this court's April 3, 2018, order directing him to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the joint response consenting to reciprocal discipline, it is

ORDERED that James B. Rudolph is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months, stayed in favor of a one-year period of probation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 A.3d 1282, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-b-rudolph-of-columbia-court-of-appeals-bar-registration-no-dc-2018.