In re James Arthur H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re James Arthur H.

45 A.D.2d 932, 357 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4505

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.2d 932 (In re James Arthur H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re James Arthur H., 45 A.D.2d 932, 357 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed, on the law and facts, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: This appeal is from an order of Family Court which adjudged the appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation. He was charged with committing an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted rape in the first degree. He was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent on the testimony of a 12-year-old infant. We find that the evidence adduced in support of the petition was insufficient to warrant conviction. All concur; Simons, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order. (Appeal- from order of Lewis County Family Court [933]*933adjudging respondent a juvenile delinquent.) Present—Witmer, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Mahoney and Goldman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed, on the law and facts, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: This appeal is from an order of Family Court which adjudged the appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation. He was charged with committing an act which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted rape in the first degree. He was adjudicated a juvenile delinquent on the testimony of a 12-year-old infant. We find that the evidence adduced in support of the petition was insufficient to warrant conviction. All concur; Simons, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order. (Appeal- from order of Lewis County Family Court [933]*933adjudging respondent a juvenile delinquent.) Present—Witmer, J. P., Cardamone, Simons, Mahoney and Goldman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 932, 357 N.Y.S.2d 555, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-arthur-h-nyappdiv-1974.