in Re James and Wendy Schick
This text of in Re James and Wendy Schick (in Re James and Wendy Schick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 8, 2018
No. 04-18-00839-CV
IN RE James and Wendy SCHICK
Original Mandamus Proceeding1
ORDER
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice
On November 6, 2018, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency temporary relief. This court believes a serious question concerning the relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest may file a response in this court no later than November 19, 2018. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. Because of the sensitive nature of this case and the need for expedited consideration, no requests for an extension of time in which to file a response will be considered.
Relator’s motion for emergency temporary relief is DENIED at this time.
It is so ORDERED on November 8, 2018.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-PA-00946, styled In the Interest of D.M.B., A child, pending in the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Martha Tanner presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re James and Wendy Schick, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-and-wendy-schick-texapp-2018.