In re James

303 So. 2d 145, 293 Ala. 759
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 7, 1974
DocketSC 885
StatusPublished

This text of 303 So. 2d 145 (In re James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re James, 303 So. 2d 145, 293 Ala. 759 (Ala. 1974).

Opinion

FAULKNER, Justice.

Even though this court is quashing the writ, it does not mean that the court necessarily approves or disapproves all that was said in the opinion by the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Writ quashed as being improvidently granted.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 So. 2d 145, 293 Ala. 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-james-ala-1974.