Home/Supreme Court of Alabama/In re James

In re James

303 So. 2d 145, 293 Ala. 759
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 7, 1974·No. SC 885·Published

Opinion

FAULKNER, Justice.

Even though this court is quashing the writ, it does not mean that the court necessarily approves or disapproves all that was said in the opinion by the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Writ quashed as being improvidently granted.

HEFLIN, C. J., and MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH, MADDOX, McCALL and JONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re James, 303 So. 2d 145, 293 Ala. 759 (Ala. 1974).

303 So. 2d 145 (In re James) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.