In re Jamel W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jamel W.

255 A.D.2d 196, 679 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12440

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 17, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 255 A.D.2d 196 (In re Jamel W.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jamel W., 255 A.D.2d 196, 679 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about September 4, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[197]*197The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant’s actions in “joining] in a formation which entrapped the victim while others [attempted] the robbery is sufficient to establish in-concert liability for robbery notwithstanding that [appellant] never spoke to or touched the victim” (Matter of Eric R., 213 AD2d 310, 311; see also, People v Corbett, 162 AD2d 415, lv denied 77 NY2d 837). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (George Jurow, J.), entered on or about September 4, 1997, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted robbery in the second degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[197]*197The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Appellant’s actions in “joining] in a formation which entrapped the victim while others [attempted] the robbery is sufficient to establish in-concert liability for robbery notwithstanding that [appellant] never spoke to or touched the victim” (Matter of Eric R., 213 AD2d 310, 311; see also, People v Corbett, 162 AD2d 415, lv denied 77 NY2d 837). Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Williams, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D.2d 196, 679 N.Y.S.2d 815, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jamel-w-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack