In re Jamel F.

1 A.D.2d 594, 767 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1 A.D.3d 594, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12591
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 24, 2003
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 594 (In re Jamel F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Jamel F., 1 A.D.2d 594, 767 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1 A.D.3d 594, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12591 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

[595]*595In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, St. Mary’s Children and Family Services appeals, by permission, from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated September 24, 2002, which, after a hearing upon a petition for a one-year extension of the subject child’s placement directed it “in the future, to respond to all explorations of placement by informing the Department of Probation exactly what program they intend to place a future respondent in.”

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements.

After the Family Court issued an order of disposition extending the placement of the subject child, the Family Court issued a separate order directing St. Mary’s Children and Family Services (hereinafter St. Mary’s) “in the future, to respond to all explorations of placement by informing the Department of Probation exactly what program they intend to place a future respondent in.”

The Family Court erred in failing to give St. Mary’s notice or an opportunity to be heard before issuing the order. In any event, the Family Court exceeded its authority (see generally Matter of Quinton A., 49 NY2d 328 [1980]; Matter of Dewayne B., 289 AD2d 571 [2001]). S. Miller, J.P, Friedmann, Townes and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rossi v. Flying Horse Farm, Inc.
131 A.D.3d 1033 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Kaygreen Realty Co., LLC v. IG Second Generation Partners, L.P.
78 A.D.3d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Yan v. Klein
35 A.D.3d 729 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Kinzler v. Kenny
8 A.D.3d 627 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Taskiran v. Murphy
8 A.D.3d 360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 594, 767 N.Y.S.2d 649, 1 A.D.3d 594, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jamel-f-nyappdiv-2003.