in Re Jaime Luevano
This text of in Re Jaime Luevano (in Re Jaime Luevano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-22-00286-CR
IN RE JAIME LUEVANO
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
From what we can discern from his petition for writ of mandamus filed on
September 1, 2022, relator, Jaime Luevano, seeks to compel the Coryell County District
Attorney’s Office to bring charges against unnamed officials at the Hughes Unit and
Becky Moore, the Coryell County District Clerk. We do not have jurisdiction to issue a
writ of mandamus against a district attorney, unless it is necessary to enforce our
jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(a), (b); see also In re Luevano, No. 10-20-
00139-CV, 2020 Tex. App. LEXIS 6159, at **1-2 (Tex. App.—Waco Aug. 5, 2020, orig.
proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Bowens, No. 10-14-00277-CR, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 10689,
at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Sept. 25, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (“As a Court of Appeals, we have no jurisdiction to compel a district attorney to act except to enforce our
jurisdiction.”). Relator has not alleged any need for this Court to enforce our jurisdiction.
Accordingly, relator’s September 1, 2022 petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for
want of jurisdiction.
STEVE SMITH Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Petition dismissed Opinion delivered and filed September 21, 2022 Do not publish [OT06]
In re Luevano Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Jaime Luevano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jaime-luevano-texapp-2022.