in Re: Jaime Covarrubias
This text of in Re: Jaime Covarrubias (in Re: Jaime Covarrubias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 21, 2018
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01398-CV
IN RE JAIME COVARRUBIAS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 292nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F99-32080-QV
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Opinion by Justice Bridges In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus asking the Court to “exercise
its authority over head District Attorney Faith Johnson.” This Court does not have jurisdiction to
issue a writ of mandamus against a district attorney unless it is necessary to enforce our own
jurisdiction. TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b) (court of appeals may only issue writ of mandamus
against district and county judges or as necessary to enforce jurisdiction of appellate court); In re
Meyer, 482 S.W.3d 706, 709 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2016, orig. proceeding) (case law is clear
that courts of appeals do not have jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against district attorney).
Relator has no appeal pending in this Court and, therefore, our jurisdiction is not in
jeopardy. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.
/David L. Bridges/ 181398F.P05 DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Jaime Covarrubias, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jaime-covarrubias-texapp-2018.