In re Jahmeiah S.-W.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jahmeiah S.-W.

21 A.D.3d 564, 799 N.Y.S.2d 902

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 22, 2005·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In two related neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Porzio, J.), dated October 2, 2003, which, after a post-dispositional hearing, directed that her visitation with her children be supervised.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother’s contention that the petitioner failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she neglected her children is not properly before this Court, as she did not appeal from the fact-finding or dispositional orders (see CPLR 5515; Matter of Guzzi v Giacalone, 11 AD3d 464 [2004]).

The mother has not addressed any points on appeal to the only order she has appealed from. Accordingly, we have no occasion to disturb this order, which directed supervised visitation. Prudenti, P.J., Goldstein, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two related neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Porzio, J.), dated October 2, 2003, which, after a post-dispositional hearing, directed that her visitation with her children be supervised.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The mother’s contention that the petitioner failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that she neglected her children is not properly before this Court, as she did not appeal from the fact-finding or dispositional orders (see CPLR 5515; Matter of Guzzi v Giacalone, 11 AD3d 464 [2004]).

The mother has not addressed any points on appeal to the only order she has appealed from. Accordingly, we have no occasion to disturb this order, which directed supervised visitation. Prudenti, P.J., Goldstein, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.

In re Jahmeiah S.-W., 21 A.D.3d 564, 799 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

21 A.D.3d 564 (In re Jahmeiah S.-W.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related