In re Jaffe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jaffe

255 A.D. 270, 7 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4709

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 4, 1938·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Several charges of unprofessional conduct were filed against the respondent. The matter was referred to an official referee, who has found that all of the charges were fully sustained by the evidence.

In 1914 this respondent was suspended for six months for unprofessional conduct (Matter of Jaffe, 164 App. Div. 153). The opinion there was written by Mr. Presiding Justice Ingraham, and concurred in by all the court.

[271]*271It is unnecessary to recite the many facts found in this proceeding. To do so would take several pages of the reports.

The respondent should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Several charges of unprofessional conduct were filed against the respondent. The matter was referred to an official referee, who has found that all of the charges were fully sustained by the evidence.

In 1914 this respondent was suspended for six months for unprofessional conduct (Matter of Jaffe, 164 App. Div. 153). The opinion there was written by Mr. Presiding Justice Ingraham, and concurred in by all the court.

[271]*271It is unnecessary to recite the many facts found in this proceeding. To do so would take several pages of the reports.

The respondent should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

In re Jaffe, 255 A.D. 270, 7 N.Y.S.2d 384, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4709 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

255 A.D. 270 (In re Jaffe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related