In re Jaffe

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Jaffe

711 A.2d 897, 154 N.J. 136, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 620

DecidedJune 30, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 711 A.2d 897 (In re Jaffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jaffe, 711 A.2d 897, 154 N.J. 136, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 620 (N.J. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 11, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARK H. JAFFE of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this [137]*137State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate); and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary officials in an ethics investigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK H. JAFFE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 11, 1997, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that MARK H. JAFFE of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this [137]*137State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect); RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence); RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate); and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary officials in an ethics investigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK H. JAFFE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

711 A.2d 897, 154 N.J. 136, 1998 N.J. LEXIS 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jaffe-nj-1998.