In re Jade Q.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Jade Q.

41 A.D.3d 327, 837 N.Y.S.2d 567

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 26, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 41 A.D.3d 327 (In re Jade Q.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Jade Q., 41 A.D.3d 327, 837 N.Y.S.2d 567 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about October 13, 2006, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon her admission that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute menacing in the third degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent rather than a person in need of supervision (see e.g. Matter of Rosemary R., 29 AD3d 309 [2006]), in view of the violent nature of appellant’s conduct toward her grandmother in the underlying incident, as well as appellant’s history of violent behavior at school and truancy problems. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Buckley, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Juan M. Merchan, J.), entered on or about October 13, 2006, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon her admission that she committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute menacing in the third degree, and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating appellant a juvenile delinquent rather than a person in need of supervision (see e.g. Matter of Rosemary R., 29 AD3d 309 [2006]), in view of the violent nature of appellant’s conduct toward her grandmother in the underlying incident, as well as appellant’s history of violent behavior at school and truancy problems. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Buckley, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Kavanagh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.3d 327, 837 N.Y.S.2d 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-jade-q-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack